AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080702105300.7c592030@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<raj.kumar@onstor.com>,<vikas.saini@onstor.com>,<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0ABCEEF1@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:53:29 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Raj Kumar" <raj.kumar@onstor.com>
Cc: Vikas Saini <vikas.saini@onstor.com>, Sandrine Boulanger
 <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Is there a patch for Dev branch for this defect ?
Message-ID: <20080702105329.351ad848@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0ABCEEF1@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03B5B7D7@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0ABCEEF1@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:41:12 -0700 "Raj Kumar" <raj.kumar@onstor.com>
wrote:

> 
> Any word on the patch? I hate to loose the run time during the long
> weekend.

The word on the patch is I don't know what people mean by "patch".  I
sent Sandrine an email asking but that was only 2 seconds ago.  Paul
suggest a "binary with the fix" which would be quite easy to make.  It
would be the FP image. 

> Thanks.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vikas Saini 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:50 PM
> To: Andy Sharp; Manohar Divate
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger; dl-QA
> Subject: RE: Is there a patch for Dev branch for this defect ?
> 
> NDMP testing is totally blocked. just to give you an idea, it takes
> around 3 weeks to complete NDMP testing.
> Manny's filer is totally down..
> People are hitting it when they are doing mirror operations.
> 
> So i believe we definitely need a patch ASAP.
> 
> Vikas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp
> Sent: Tue 7/1/2008 8:45 PM
> To: Manohar Divate
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; dl-QA
> Subject: Re: Is there a patch for Dev branch for this defect ?
>  
> People keep talking about a patch but I'm not sure what that means.
> Are they not able to work on other things until the next submittal or
> is that not relevant?
> 
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:34:00 -0700 "Manohar Divate"
> <manohar.divate@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > My bad, I will be downgrading to sub#27 since fallowing is happening
> > in a loop
> > 
> > Filer 1 hits defect 24555 and all VSVR's failover to Filer2, now
> > Filer 2 hits defect 24554.
> > 
> > 
> > Manny
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sandrine Boulanger 
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:14 PM
> > To: Manohar Divate; Vikas Saini; Andy Sharp
> > Cc: dl-QA
> > Subject: RE: Is there a patch for Dev branch for this defect ?
> > 
> > Andy, can you help?
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manohar Divate 
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:12 PM
> > To: Vikas Saini
> > Cc: dl-QA
> > Subject: Is there a patch for Dev branch for this defect ?
> > 
> > My Node is continuously hitting this assert
> > 
> > Defect 24555 dup of 24527 (beta)
> > g10r204:~# cat /var/log/messages |grep -i Panic
> > Jul  1 11:25:29 g10r204 kernel: fp0: Panic : scsi-ll.c:372:
> > ASSERTION failure "(sd->status & SD_DEV_STATUS_MASK) != SCSI_DEV_
> > Jul  1 13:55:15 g10r204 kernel: fp0: Panic : scsi-ll.c:372:
> > ASSERTION failure "(sd->status & SD_DEV_STATUS_MASK) != SCSI_DEV_
> > Jul  1 18:15:35 g10r204 kernel: fp0: Panic : scsi-ll.c:372:
> > ASSERTION failure "(sd->status & SD_DEV_STATUS_MASK) != SCSI_DEV_
> > Jul  1 18:59:26 g10r204 kernel: fp2: Panic : scsi-ll.c:372:
> > ASSERTION failure "(sd->status & SD_DEV_STATUS_MASK) != SCSI_DEV_
> > g10r204:~#
> 
