AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080709135556.59875b1a@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C96F9@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 13:56:04 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Patch build  for Mightydog?
Message-ID: <20080709135604.1b4f4145@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C96F9@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <20080709113118.53101f8b@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C96F9@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

You can SIGSTOP this for now, as I thought, now they realize it's on
the storage/FP side, probably a disk array problem.

Sigh.

On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 13:24:22 -0700 "Larry Scheer"
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> Andy,
>    I integrated this change into the cg_beta brancb and did a build.
> The FP and TXRX processors did not come up after the upgrade and a
> reboot. This is on g4r5.
> 
> I did a p4 resolve -as (safe merge.) Only 2 files needed a merge after
> that since there were no conflicts I did a p4 resolve and accepted the
> merge.
> 
> Perhaps there are other changes that are needed?
> 
> Larry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:31 AM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Subject: Re: Patch build for Mightydog?
> 
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:59:24 -0700 "Larry Scheer"
> <larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > Andy,
> >    You were going to send me the change list to create the patch.
> > Did the need for a Mightydog patch change? Are we still doing this?
> > If so I would like to get started on it.
> > 
> > Larry
> 
> Thanks for reminding me.  I'm blocking this because it's a waste of
> time.  Let's hope I'm wrong.
> 
> Let me know if there is any difficulty doing the merge.
> 
> Thanks,
> a
> 
> 
> Change 29882 by maximk@maximk-13 on 2008/06/27 11:09:41
> 
> 	10631. Send the packets of the connection on the same link
> 	       the incoming packets were received.
> 	       Reviewed by jong.
> 
> Affected files ...
> 
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-bsd-net/vstack_vlink.c#6 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-bsd-netinet/tcp_input.c#3 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-bsd-netinet/tcp_output.c#3 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-luc/luc-rx.c#16 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-pkt/pkt.h#3 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-tpl/tpl-api.h#3 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-tpl/tpl-conn.c#5 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-tpl/tpl-xmt.c#3 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-tpl/tpl.h#4 edit
