AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080716132159.30d9e6f5@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>,<vikas.saini@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9721@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:22:50 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Cc: "Vikas Saini" <vikas.saini@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Submittal 31 did not pass acceptance tests
Message-ID: <20080716132250.34e716a6@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9721@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9720@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9721@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

What about a build without that checkin?

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:40:20 -0700 "Larry Scheer"
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> Here is an update. We have identified the check in that introduced the
> problem. It affects other arrays besides LSI. Bill is working on a
> fix.
> 
> Given that this problem affects other arrays I don't want to give you
> a build without this fix. I will be filing a defect.
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:28 PM
> To: Vikas Saini
> Subject: RE: Submittal 31 did not pass acceptance tests
> 
> The problem is in the scsi layer which is too fundamental to let
> slide. Bill and Jim are looking into the problem. We are still in the
> early stages of the investigation.
> 
> Larry
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Vikas Saini 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:28 AM
> To: Larry Scheer; dl-Cougar; dl-QA
> Subject: RE: Submittal 31 did not pass acceptance tests
> 
> Any update... really like to have a patch or submittal ASAP.
> 
> Thanks
> Vikas
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:05 PM
> To: dl-Cougar; dl-QA
> Subject: Submittal 31 did not pass acceptance tests
> 
> Folks,
>      I ran into a problem with submittal 31 where two cheetahs and one
> bobcat are missing their management volumes.
> All three systems are showing an incorrect device name for the LUN on
> the core volume. The management volumes do not show up with a vol show
> or a lun show, however when the system is rebooted with submittal 30
> the volumes are there and the device names are displayed correctly.
> 
> All three of these systems the core volume and management volumes are
> on the same array: LSI_E4600A_R46
> 
> The following elog messages are appearing on all the affected systems:
> 
> Jul 15 21:57:20 eng155 : 0:0:spm:INFO: spm_pollAddDevice: Found
> dev[LSI__] wwn[0x0] lun[0] type[0] sid[0] size[20971392]
> Jul 15 21:57:26 eng155 : 0:0:vsd:ERROR: vsd_mountVolProc : Aborting
> mount operation for VS 1; 1 volume(s) owned but only 0 found
> 
> The core volume Device name should be:
> 
> LUN List
> Idx   Device Name                       Size (MiB)
> --------------------------------------------------
> 1     LSI_E4600A_R46_eng155_core        10239.94
> 
> But is:
> 
> LUN List
> Idx   Device Name                       Size (MiB)
> --------------------------------------------------
> 1     LSI__                             10239.94
