AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080721011745.43bf0bb0@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E099A0DE8@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:38:22 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Brian Stark" <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Greetings from London
Message-ID: <20080721013822.10a9d028@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E099A0DE8@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E099A0DE8@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:29:55 -0700 "Brian Stark"
<brian.stark@onstor.com> wrote:

> So are you saying the monkeys will be running the asylum?  -:)
> 
> I think we know what's going on with the Ops and seep settings.  Just
> waiting for more testing to confirm.

There's a lot more than that.  Most of the systems don't seem able to
use the sc1 ports, the systems seem to be going out with sub26 on them
instead of sub28, and so forth.

> I appreciate you trying to get me out of the RFI.  By the way, is
> your backlog down to 0?  Or will you be working on it while at your
> boondoggle?

Oh please.

> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andy Sharp
> To: Brian Stark
> Sent: Sun Jul 20 17:28:27 2008
> Subject: Re: Greetings from London
> 
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:21:36 -0700 "Brian Stark"
> <brian.stark@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > Cool, thanks for the update.  I think we're all on the same page
> > after our conf call last night.  Dump/restore continues to be the
> > biggest headache, but the other areas look pretty good.
> > 
> > One other thing...give some thought to who will back you up next
> > week given that you'll be on your own boondoggle.  Jonathan will be
> > out towards the later part of the week for a meeting with IBM, so
> > I'm not sure he can do it.  I also was just informed by Bob that
> > I'll be going to the same meeting, which means flying back to SFO
> > on Tuesday and then getting on a plane for New York on Wednesday
> > and coming back late on Thursday or early Friday.  My wife is gonna
> > be so happy about that.
> 
> I'm thinking this is an idea that needs to be revisited.  There are a
> lot of hardware/manufacturing/ops/whatever issues happening at the
> moment, and I think that it would a better utilization of your time to
> be here managing the resolution of all those important issues.
> Personally I don't think we need both you and Jonathan at that
> meeting, not as much as we need at least one responsible adult with a
> technical brain in the headquarters.
> 
> I'll be out starting Tues.  Sandrine is out.  Jon is out.  Jobi is
> out.  You're out.  That's just too many of the sane people with a
> technical bent out of the office who can also take time to manage a
> situation. That pretty much leaves Hammer and Max in charge.  In which
> case we could all save some time and just never bother coming back.
> Yes, I eggagerate.  Yes, it's fun to do so.
> 
> I'm just sayin'-
> 
> a
> 
