AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080722114141.754f0975@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9735@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:41:50 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Check-in that shouild be integrated to r400rel?
Message-ID: <20080722114150.222dadd7@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9735@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9735@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Check with Ed about this.  It seems like it should be.  He can take
care of it.

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:54:50 -0700 "Larry Scheer"
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> Andy,
>     I think this check in fixes a customer reported defect. The HCL
> developer didn't check it into r400rel but he did the other release
> branches. Should I go ahead and integrate this into r400rel?
> 
> Larry
> 
> Change 30117 by perforce@DDEVARAJ-WINXP on 2008/07/21 23:57:55
> 
> 	TED00024795 : SSL certificates expired.
> 	
> 	Renewed SSL Certificate.Valid from 21-07-2008 to 21-07-2009.
> 	
> 	reviewed by sripal.
> 
> Affected files ...
> 
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-sct/servcert#3 edit
> 
> 
> http://liszt:1818/@md=d&cd=//depot/$c=G35@/30117?ac=10
> 
> 
