AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080801173855.5de6ec25@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<chris.vandever@onstor.com>,<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>,<ronb@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0B24421D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:38:59 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Chris Vandever <chris.vandever@onstor.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Goldick" <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>, "Ron Bhanukitsiri"
 <ronb@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Defect  TED00024924 priv command failed to resolve nis user
 name in a cluster
Message-ID: <20080801173859.4b0751f3@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0B24421D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <ONSTOR-EXCH01F11mTc000036d8@onstor-exch01.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0B24421D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Inline:

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:35:30 -0700 "Ron Bhanukitsiri" <ronb@onstor.com>
wrote:

> On a 2nd look, I just updated the defect and this one may also
> actually be a WAD :-).
> 
> Ron B[ee]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ron.bhanukitsiri@onstor.com
> [mailto:ron.bhanukitsiri@onstor.com] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008
> 5:35 PM To: Ron Bhanukitsiri; Ron Bhanukitsiri; Ponmaalathy Latha
> Cc: Ponmaalathy Latha; Vikas Saini; Chris Vandever
> Subject: Defect TED00024924 priv command failed to resolve nis user
> name in a cluster
> 
> Headline: priv command failed to resolve nis user name in a cluster
> id: TED00024924
> Note_Entry: Umm, on 2nd look, this defect might actually be related to
> TED 24919.  The reason is that in order to resolve the uid, a nis
> daemon must run *locally*.

Chris, can we get confirmation from you that NIS uid resolution does
not go through the cluster subsystem, which is what I thought all
along, and now Ron seems to be saying the same thing?  Only bother if
you know off the top of your head.  -Thanks.

> Suggestion: QA verifies if there's a vserver running for NIS domain in
> enghcl2.  If so, then I think this is prbably a WAD too.
> 
> State: Assigned
> history: 33765219	Jul 28 2008  8:00AM	platha
> Submit	no_value Opened
> 33765223	Jul 28 2008  8:01AM	platha
> Modify	Opened	Opened 33765224	Jul 28 2008
> 8:09AM	platha	Modify	Opened	Opened
> 33765322	Jul 28 2008  2:07PM	chrisv
> Modify	Opened	Opened 33765341	Jul 28 2008
> 2:24PM	vikas	Modify	Opened	Opened
> 33765346	Jul 28 2008  2:25PM	vikas
> Need_more_info	Opened More_Info 33765432	Jul 28 2008
> 10:41PM	ronb	Modify	More_Info More_Info
> 33765593	Jul 29 2008 10:03PM	platha	Back_to_dev
> More_Info	Assigned 33766171	Aug  1 2008  5:28PM
> andrews	Modify	Assigned Assigned
> 33766172	08/01/2008 17:34:24 PM	ronb
> Modify	Assigned Assigned
> 
