AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080901112706.77faad97@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<yasuhiro.murata@onstor.com>,<rendell.fong@onstor.com>,<ronb@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0B730308@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 11:30:13 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Yasuhiro Murata" <yasuhiro.murata@onstor.com>
Cc: "Rendell Fong" <rendell.fong@onstor.com>, "Ron Bhanukitsiri"
 <ronb@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Clarifing interface port that service can be usable
Message-ID: <20080901113013.0cb2b623@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0B730308@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0B730308@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:41:48 -0700 "Yasuhiro Murata"
<yasuhiro.murata@onstor.com> wrote:

> Hello  Andy san, Rendel san  and Ron san
>  
> I hear from Sandrine that you are the best authorities to answer the
> questions I asked below.
>  
> Could you please let me know the answer?
>  
>  
> (Q3) Is my understanding below correct?
> 
>  
> 
>      Bobcat sends the autosuppprt email via SC or FP ports which has
> the route to the smtp server.
> 
>      When both SC and FP ports have the route to the smtp server,  FP
> is used.
> 
>  
> 
> (Q4) When SNMP server located on the network that bobcat can be
> reachable only via FP ports,
> 
>      all the SNMP service (GET/SET/TRAP) does work fine?
> 
>  
> 
> (Q5) Does Bobcat access to the LDAP server via SC port?

No.  LDAP server may be specific to vsvr network, so it is specific to
FP ports.

>      ie. In case that LDAP server is located on the network that
> bobcat can be reachable only
> 
>      via SC ports, does the LDAP setting works fine in this
> environment?

Not as far as I know.

> 
>  
> Best Regards,
> Yasuhiro Murata
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Sandrine Boulanger 
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 9:49 AM
> To: Yasuhiro Murata
> Subject: RE: Clarifing interface port that service can be usable
> 
> 
> 
> Andy Sharp, Rendell Fong and Ron B 
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Yasuhiro Murata 
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 5:35 PM
> To: Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: RE: Clarifing interface port that service can be usable
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Sandrine san
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you very much for the reply.
> 
>  
> 
> Is it possible to let me know the pest person to answer the question
> (3)-(5)?
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Yasuhiro Murata
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Sandrine Boulanger 
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 2:57 AM
> To: Yasuhiro Murata
> Subject: RE: Clarifing interface port that service can be usable
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yasuhiro Murata 
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 11:37 PM
> To: dl-cstech
> Subject: Clarifing interface port that service can be usable
> 
>  
> 
> Hello all,
> 
>  
> 
> Customer ask me the question below to design their network that
> Bobcats are installed.
> 
> Could you give me the answer?
> 
>  
> 
> (1) Does Bobcat access to the NTP server via FP port by using vserver?
> 
>  
> 
> [S] No, this is through the SC port, need a route to it if in
> different subnet
> 
>  
> 
> (2) Does Bobcat need to be reachable to DNS server  from both SC ports
> and FP ports?
> 
>      Or either one would be enough?
> 
>  
> 
> [S] it depends what they want to do. It's not required at SC level if
> they use the sc ips to connect to the box. It's best practice to set
> DNS for the mgmt vsvr if you want to get the autosupport emails.
> 
>  
> 
>      Customer wants to know 
> 
>      When it is reachable to DNS only from FP ports, the name
> resolution for node context does work?
> 
>      And in case reachable only form SC ports, name resolution for
> vseres does work?
> 
> [S] they are independent
> 
>  
> 
> (3) Is my understanding below correct?
> 
>  
> 
>      Bobcat sends the autosuppprt email via SC or FP ports which has
> the route to the smtp server.
> 
>      When both SC and FP ports have the route to the smtp server,  FP
> is used.
> 
>  
> 
> (4) When SNMP server located on the network that bobcat can be
> reachable only via FP ports,
> 
>      all the SNMP service (GET/SET/TRAP) does work fine?
> 
>  
> 
> (5) Does Bobcat access to the LDAP server via SC port?
> 
>  
> 
>      ie. In case that LDAP server is located on the network that
> bobcat can be reachable only via SC ports,
> 
>          does the LDAP setting works fine in this environment?
> 
>  
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Yasuhiro Murata
> 
