AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080916135510.18a2e0f8@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<ed.kwan@onstor.com>,<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0BA2845C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:55:57 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>, "Jonathan Goldick"
 <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Defect  Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
 message on g10r10
Message-ID: <20080916135557.106158f5@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0BA2845C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <ONSTOR-EXCH01FEZEqz000047ff@onstor-exch01.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0BA28450@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<20080916134205.1d70a262@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0BA2845C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Can we discuss this amongst ourselves?  Max is being his
characteristically moronic self when he perceives that he might have to
work on something he doesn't want to work on, and it's holding up
progress on figuring out what to do with this bug.

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:46:35 -0700 "Maxim Kozlovsky"
<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:

> You can not argue that having 500 exim processes running is not a bug
> which does not need to be fixed. Whatever the reason is, we should not
> have process duplication. Fix this one, if we still have the problem
> after that we'll look at it.
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Andy Sharp
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 1:42 PM
> >To: Maxim Kozlovsky
> >Cc: Ed Kwan; Jonathan Goldick
> >Subject: Re: Defect Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
> >message on g10r10
> >
> >Exim is the victim, not the instigator, as I said before.
> >
> >On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:37:25 -0700 "Maxim Kozlovsky"
> ><maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I think Andy should work on fixing the problem with too many exim4
> >> processes running. The clustering problems are likely to be the
> >> downstream of that. Since every exim4 process opens a rmc session
> >> to the clusterrpc, too many processes will exhaust the limit of
> >> open sessions and cause the clustering failures.
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: chris.vandever@onstor.com [mailto:chris.vandever@onstor.com]
> >> >Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 1:30 PM
> >> >To: dl-Escalation
> >> >Cc: Ed Kwan; Jonathan Goldick; May Ma; Sandrine Boulanger; Ed
> >> >Kwan;
> >> Chris
> >> >Vandever; Andy Sharp
> >> >Subject: Defect Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
> >> message on
> >> >g10r10
> >> >
> >> >company_name:
> >> >id: TED00023471
> >> >Headline: [Cougar] repeating cluster error message on g10r10
> >> >State: Assigned
> >> >Note_Entry: The mightydog crash is defect #25366.  Subsequent
> >> >analysis there seems to indicate this is unrelated.
> >> >
> >> >Release_Project: 4.0.0.0
> >>
