AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080919145456.6341f09d@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<chris.vandever@onstor.com>,<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>,<susan.harvell@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AE22B76@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:55:18 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Chris Vandever" <chris.vandever@onstor.com>
Cc: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>, "Jonathan Goldick"
 <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>, "Susan Harvell" <susan.harvell@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Interview Yury Zayrinov
Message-ID: <20080919145518.77e4f681@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AE22B76@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0BAC84C9@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AE22B76@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:49:55 -0700 "Chris Vandever"
<chris.vandever@onstor.com> wrote:

> I would give a reserved "yes".
> 
> He wants responsibility, wants to be involved in architecture and big
> decisions, and wants to work on advanced technology.
> 
> He is used to having to open a defect to document new features, and
> considers not requiring a defect # in order to do a check-in a "breach
> of discipline" (said with a smile).

He is correct about that of course.

> He's worked in environments that require a code review team, but
> prefers a "custodianship" environment, where people aspire to become
> the custodian for a subsystem with full responsibility for it.  A
> custodian doesn't require a code review for check-ins to their area.
> (Of course, they ran nightly automated testing, so they knew
> immediately if anything was broken.)  This promotes people, whereas a
> code review environment puts them down, implies that they aren't
> trusted.

We could adopt that model.  However it would be denied to anyone born
in Russia, so that would not make him any happier.

> He takes pride in his work.  He can be "stubborn" (his word).

Hmm, I'm liking him more now than before.  Still working on my feedback.
