AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20081016131538.03528cf5@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09CB8BC3@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:16:20 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Sandrine Boulanger" <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Defect  Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
 message on g10r10
Message-ID: <20081016131620.0005628e@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09CB8BC3@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AE22BB7@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09CB8BC3@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It's coolcat, so you should be able to find it in the dw.

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:32:54 -0700 "Sandrine Boulanger"
<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com> wrote:

> Andy, you mentioned yesterday that you're seeing this message on your
> system. Could you tell us the ip and we can browse the logs to see if
> this is similar behavior?
> I believe that what we are missing from the time we collected data on
> MD (rmc traces and cluster core) is the tcpdump data.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Vandever 
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:23 AM
> To: Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: FW: Defect Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
> message on g10r10 
> 
> At one time Damon claimed he was able to reproduce this problem.  Can
> we get him to try again to collect the info Max needs?  If we wait
> for a window to collect the info on mightydog we'll never get this
> tracked down and fixed.
> 
> ChrisV
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Kwan 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 1:36 PM
> To: Timothy Swenson
> Cc: Maxim Kozlovsky; May Ma; John Rogers; Andy Sharp; Chris Vandever;
> Sandrine Boulanger; dl-Escalation
> Subject: RE: Defect Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
> message on g10r10 
> 
> Tim?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Vandever
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 1:35 PM
> > To: Sandrine Boulanger; Ed Kwan; dl-Escalation
> > Cc: Ed Kwan; Maxim Kozlovsky; May Ma; John Rogers; Andy Sharp
> > Subject: RE: Defect Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
> > message on g10r10
> > 
> > The last I heard Max wanted tcpdump traces in addition to the RMC
> traces
> > and core for cluster_contrl with the higher PID.  That's why it was
> > in "more info".  I'm not sure why it was changed from "more info"
> > to "not reproducible" if it's still happening.  Perhaps the wrong
> > defect was updated?
> > 
> > ChrisV
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sandrine Boulanger
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 1:13 PM
> > To: Ed Kwan; dl-Escalation
> > Cc: Ed Kwan; Maxim Kozlovsky; May Ma; John Rogers; Chris Vandever;
> Andy
> > Sharp
> > Subject: RE: Defect Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
> > message on g10r10
> > 
> > This is still happening on MD. We are receiving the cluster error rc
> 30
> > every 30 minutes.
> > What happened to the rmc tracing and cluster cores we collected at
> some
> > point on MD? Has anybody looked at those?
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ed.kwan@onstor.com [mailto:ed.kwan@onstor.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 1:07 PM
> > To: dl-Escalation
> > Cc: Ed Kwan; Maxim Kozlovsky; May Ma; Sandrine Boulanger; John
> > Rogers; Chris Vandever; Andy Sharp
> > Subject: Defect Yes TED00023471 [Cougar] repeating cluster error
> message
> > on g10r10
> > 
> > company_name:
> > id: TED00023471
> > Headline: [Cougar] repeating cluster error message on g10r10
> > State: Not_Reproducible
> > Note_Entry:
> > From: Andy Sharp
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 5:32 PM
> > To: Timothy Swenson
> > Subject: Re: Defect 23471
> > 
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:24:35 -0700 "Timothy Swenson"
> > <timothy.swenson@onstor.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > This defect is escalated.  It looks like it has not reoccured in a
> > > while on MD.  Ed would like to de-escalated it.  Support is OK
> > > with that. Since you escalated it, need your buy in to
> > > de-escalate it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Tim Swenson
> > 
> > Sure.
> > 
> > Release_Project: 4.0.0.0
> 
