AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20081024162142.1bc9f0c8@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51754C6BC94@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:24:28 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Brian Stark" <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: tuxrx proposal and BB
Message-ID: <20081024162428.61501b44@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51754C6BC94@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <20081024155257.608b5193@ripper.onstor.net>
	<2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51754C6BC94@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:03:17 -0700 "Brian Stark"
<brian.stark@onstor.com> wrote:

> Andy,
> 
> Go ahead and schedule that.  I talked to him about it, and he just
> wanted you to go through the proposal and explain it in more detail.

OK, will do.

> Also, sorry for the hoops that you have to jump through with
> Tridigital. I was caught off guard myself that basically all POs are
> being held until the new financial plan can be worked out for the
> Board to approve. If I had known that this was the case, I would have
> told you when we were talking yesterday.

I'm pretty upset about this for several reasons, not the least of which
is if Onstor doesn't at least pony up for the work that has been done,
then I will have to out of my own pocket.  Which will suck a lot.
Another is that the damn paper work for this sat on Susan's desk for
two weeks, and would have been signed and sealed long before if she had
just done her job when she was supposed to. This despite pinging at
least 3 times a week. Now TDI is plenty annoyed and there's always a
chance that they will find engagement on another project before we can
pull our collective heads out of our collective ... leaving us back at
square one.  In the end I'm thinking this "belt tightening" hurts our
chances of staying viable more than it helps.  If it was someone else
besides Bob, I would say maybe this is a prudent thing for the board to
do, but personally I think it would be better for the company if they
would just trust Bob to handle it.




> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:53 PM
> To: Brian Stark
> Subject: tuxrx proposal and BB
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> I know you talked to Bob yesterday.  He had asked me to schedule some
> time with him to go over the tuxrx project proposal.  I don't know if
> you had a chance to do that yesterday or if I should still do that.
> 
> a
> 
