AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20081028174239.78eb1842@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<bfisher@onstor.com>,<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,<fisher@meer.net>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	4907AD6C.2010301@onstor.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:42:42 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: William Fisher <bfisher@onstor.com>
Cc: Maxim Kozlovsky <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>, <fisher@meer.net>
Subject: Re: wiki schedule in 2005 for Pyx S/W on EEE
Message-ID: <20081028174242.228083cf@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4907AD6C.2010301@onstor.com>
References: <4907AD6C.2010301@onstor.com>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It's a marketing priority.

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:25:16 -0700 William Fisher <bfisher@onstor.com>
wrote:

> http://intranet.onstor.net/md/QA/Projects/Pinto/Schedule/iSCSIIntegratedSchedule.html
> 
> I read the original MRD from 2004 and found the above schedule for a 
> "native" EEE port to both Bobcat and cougar.
> 
> I talked with Max and he noted that this was never completed. The path
> to-date is to use the Storage Assry's to provide the iSCSI support.
> 
> Hence, is iSCSI a detour and isn't a development priority?
> 
> Later,
> 
> -- Bill
