AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20081103164945.766069fd@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:exch1.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,<brian.stark@onstor.com>,<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:50:35 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Maxim Kozlovsky <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
Cc: Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>, Jonathan Goldick
 <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
Subject: exim4 testing ideas
Message-ID: <20081103165035.025ec63e@ripper.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

So I've produced a new version of exim4 which I hope will address the
issues, but I have no way of testing to see if it has the same problems
as the previous version.  Is there a way to cause RMC to retry always
or something?  If that is even the problem?  I have removed the use of
setitimer in exim (which uses SIGALRM) and added a rmc_shutdown() call
after all the RMC related function calls have returned ... I think.

Any ideas or help appreciated.

Thanks,

a
