AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20081111182733.1fcd928f@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:exch1.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175D5BE23E@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:27:49 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Sandrine Boulanger <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: important change for the release branches
Message-ID: <20081111182749.3d06a3c6@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175D5BE23E@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175D6201CB@exch1.onstor.net>
	<2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175D5BE23E@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:46:06 -0800 Sandrine Boulanger
<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com> wrote:

> No objection.
> Andy, did you update all nodes on the soak?

Yes.  Damnit, did I forget to tell you?  Shoot.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Scheer 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:09 PM
> To: Andy Sharp; Ed Kwan
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger; Brian Stark
> Subject: RE: important change for the release branches
> 
> This change made it into the r331rel branch, but not into a 3.3.1.X
> release. Due to the obscene way 3.3.2.0 was done it also did not make
> it into the 3.3.2.0 release. However it is in the r332rel branch. I
> suppose it will be in a patch release of 3.3.2, someday.
> 
> This change needs to be integrated into the r401rel branch.
> Sandrine, Ed, any objections to me integrating this change into
> r401rel?
> 
> Larry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 3:45 PM
> To: Ed Kwan
> Cc: Larry Scheer; Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: important change for the release branches
> 
> This change should probably go into the release branches, especially
> because I'm about to integrate a change (for exim) on top of it to the
> r401rel branch.  Never mind that the field probably thinks it's in
> these branches?  
> 
> Change 30762 by larrys@larrys-r14-dmip on 2008/09/22 16:16:39
> 
>         TED00025299 LSI Lab - Case9544 - file /etc/mdrive_fstab
> missing. system copy all -i writes to local filesystem
>         
>         Change system copy to copy /etc/mdrive_fstab from primary
> flash to standby flash. Also need to copy mdrive_fstab to standby
> flash in system init. In tweak_filesystem /etc/mdrive_fstab was being
> copied to/etc/fstab on the standby flash versus /etc/mdrive_fstab.
> This was overwriting the standby /etc/fstab we just created and not
> placing /etc/mdrive_fstab on the newly initialized flash. 
>         
>         Remove /etc/old_mdrive_fstab from the release distribution.
> This file has the old (pre 3.0) compact flash layout. Some SEs and
> PSEs are copying this file to /etc/mdrive_fstab as a workaround to
> defect 25299 -- /etc/mdrive_fstab missing after a system copy all -i
> -- This file is obsolete and no longer has a purpose in our BSD
> distribution. 
>         Reviewed by: AndyS
> 
> Affected files ...
> 
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/ssc-genlib/fs-linux.c#10 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/ssc-genlib/fs-openbsd.c#8 edit
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c#21 edit
> ... //depot/dev/openbsd/src/etc/Makefile#7 edit
