AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:exch1.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<eric.barrett@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175DB9E3F5@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:23:50 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Eric Barrett <eric.barrett@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: unconverted volumes after upgrade
Message-ID: <20081208112350.38532d2e@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175DB9E3F5@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175DB9E27C@exch1.onstor.net>
	<2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175D5BE3AD@exch1.onstor.net>
	<2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB5175DB9E3F5@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dennis was laid off ~:^(

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:52:01 -0800 Eric Barrett
<eric.barrett@onstor.com> wrote:

> We definitely do, since I get customers asking about it occasionally
> (yes Dennis, they're actually reading the notes!).
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Sandrine Boulanger
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 7:37 PM
> To: Jean-Paul Junod; dl-cstech
> Subject: RE: unconverted volumes after upgrade
> 
> I think we already mentioned this in the RN, at least for 3.3.x.
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Jean-Paul Junod
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 4:35 PM
> To: dl-cstech
> Subject: unconverted volumes after upgrade
> 
> I've been working with a customer who has been forced to re-EEK his
> volume multiple times because of reoccurring errors.  While going
> through his config I noticed that the volumes that these errors were
> occurring on were at file system layout version 26.  I asked him to
> convert these volumes manually and see if the errors still return.
> 
> Because of the fact that some volumes are not automatically converted
> to file system layout version 29 during an upgrade; I was wondering
> if it makes sense to mention this somewhere in the release notes and
> also say sometime during the upgrade whether volumes need to be
> converted at a later time.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> J.P.
