AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20081219153558.530fafe1@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:exch1.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<narayan.venkat@onstor.com>,<dl-LeopardCoreTeam@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51762E4FC97@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:36:24 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Narayan Venkat <narayan.venkat@onstor.com>
Cc: dl-Leopard Core Team <dl-LeopardCoreTeam@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Interesting comments on ZFS on BSD
Message-ID: <20081219153624.3f686318@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51762E4FC97@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51762E4FC97@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:18:05 -0800 Narayan Venkat
<narayan.venkat@onstor.com> wrote:

> FYI. http://kerneltrap.org/FreeBSD/BSDCan_2008_ZFS_Internals
> 
> 
> " He went on to note that he's personally used ZFS on FreeBSD in
> production for 2 years, and on his laptop for more than 1 year, "it
> just works, and it doesn't lose data. It doesn't corrupt data, and
> you don't have to wait for fsck.""

Strange, he didn't mention the performance on his laptop.  I use XFS on
my laptop, and it just works, it doesn't lose data, it doesn't corrupt
data, you don't have to wait for fsck, and, oh yeah, it's faster than
greased lightning.  I'm just sayin' ~:^)