AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090107100932.4103127d@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:exch1.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51762F49AFF@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:09:53 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Sandrine Boulanger <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: TuxRx Functional Spec
Message-ID: <20090107100953.62d9dc27@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51762F49AFF@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <20090106152711.76b59d5d@ripper.onstor.net>
	<2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51762F49AFF@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:15:37 -0800 Sandrine Boulanger
<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com> wrote:

> Looks good. Once we find out how we deliver this code, even if it's
> with a new model only, we might need to have a migration process, but
> we're not there yet!

Thanks.  When it gets closer to that time, I'm interested in hearing any
ideas you might have!

Cheers,

a

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:27 PM
> To: dl-Design Review
> Subject: RFC: TuxRx Functional Spec
> 
> Please review and comment on the TuxRx Project Functional Spec:
> 
> http://ripper.onstor.net/eng/tuxrx/tuxrx_func_spec.pdf
> 
> http://ripper.onstor.net/eng/tuxrx/tuxrx_func_spec.pages
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> a
