AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:exch1.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E65158@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:22:53 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: test proms
Message-ID: <20090130182253.451468da@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E65158@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <20090130163457.12368630@ripper.onstor.net>
	<2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E65158@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Shoot.  I'll take a look at it.

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:30:14 -0800 Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>
wrote:

> Did the system upgrade and it didn't work.  Here's the system if you
> want to take a look:
> 
> SSC IP 10.1.1.132
> Console 10.1.1.100 2010
> 
> Looks like the FP never gets out of PROM.  I don't have a console on
> the TXRX, but I'm guessing it doesn't get out of PROM either.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 4:35 PM
> To: Brian Stark
> Subject: Re: test proms
> 
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:59:23 -0800 Brian Stark
> <brian.stark@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > Still doesn't work for me.  But you never answered the question from
> > my last email, so maybe that's why:
> > 
> > >>Where do I need to upgrade the runtime from in order to try the
> > >>new loading?
> 
> 
> If you want to upgrade the runtime, you can get any of the nightly
> builds from the dev branch for this week.
> 
> Something went screwy, I don't know how but I completely missed your
> email when you sent it.
> 
> 
> I don't know if you get these:
> 
> 
> From: Build User <build@compile3.onstor.net>
> To: dl-Software <dl-software@onstor.com>, dl-QA <dl-qa@onstor.com>
> Subject: [Nightly] Build of branch dev PASSED last night
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:20:41 -0800
> 
> Nightly build successful
> 
> Location of builds:
> 
> http://10.2.0.21/upgrade/NIGHTLY/R3.3.3.0DEV-BCDBG-013009.tar.gz
> 
> http://10.2.0.21/upgrade/NIGHTLY/R3.3.3.0DEV-BC-013009.tar.gz
> 
> http://10.2.0.21/upgrade/NIGHTLY/R4.0.2.0DEV-BLDBG-013009.tar.gz
> 
> http://10.2.0.21/upgrade/NIGHTLY/R4.0.2.0DEV-BL-013009.tar.gz
> 
> http://10.2.0.21/upgrade/NIGHTLY/R4.0.2.0DEV-CGDBG-013009.tar.gz
> 
> http://10.2.0.21/upgrade/NIGHTLY/R4.0.2.0DEV-CG-013009.tar.gz
> 
> 
> Ignore the 4.0.2, that's just the tree-name in the dev branch at the
> moment.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Sharp 
> > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:43 PM
> > To: Maxim Kozlovsky
> > Cc: Brian Stark; Bill Fisher; Rendell Fong
> > Subject: Re: test proms
> > 
> > OK, copy 
> > 
> > ~andys/src/dev/linux/tools/load_vmlinux to /onstor/bin on your
> > filer, and change
> > 
> > export NICENESS=5
> > 
> > in /etc/init.d/onstor-load-embedded to
> > 
> > export NICENESS=0
> > 
> > That should give you much quicker "up" time.  Let me know.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > a
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:03:59 -0800 Maxim Kozlovsky
> > <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Or wait, it did. It just took very long to boot..
> > > 
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Maxim Kozlovsky
> > > >Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 2:01 PM
> > > >To: Brian Stark; Andy Sharp
> > > >Cc: Bill Fisher; Rendell Fong
> > > >Subject: RE: test proms
> > > >
> > > >Did not work for me again.
> > > >
> > > >>-----Original Message-----
> > > >>From: Brian Stark
> > > >>Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 1:46 PM
> > > >>To: Andy Sharp
> > > >>Cc: Bill Fisher; Maxim Kozlovsky; Rendell Fong
> > > >>Subject: RE: test proms
> > > >>
> > > >>The old loading worked fine.
> > > >>
> > > >>Where do I need to upgrade the runtime from in order to try the
> > > >>new loading?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>-----Original Message-----
> > > >>From: Andy Sharp
> > > >>Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 1:40 PM
> > > >>To: Brian Stark
> > > >>Cc: Bill Fisher; Maxim Kozlovsky; Rendell Fong
> > > >>Subject: test proms
> > > >>
> > > >>Sooo,
> > > >>
> > > >>Any brave souls want to try the prom I built yesterday on their
> > > >>SSC?  I actually tested both loading scenarios this time to make
> > > >>sure the old and the new work fully.... Anybody?
> > > >>
> > > >>Attractive new feature: no more spinner.  Which shaves a few
> > > >>seconds off the load times even for the old-timey image loading
> > > >>method, and puts an end to gummed up log files.  Just a few dots
> > > >>now.  Booyeah.
> > > >>
> > > >>Cheers,
> > > >>
> > > >>a
> > > >>
> > > >>tftp://10.0.0.42/andy_x-2.0.69.bin
