AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090202104600.2d98ca5d@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:exch1.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<patrick.haverty@onstor.com>,<dl-LeopardCoreTeam@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E651DB@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:46:19 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Patrick Haverty <patrick.haverty@onstor.com>
Cc: dl-Leopard Core Team <dl-LeopardCoreTeam@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS Default Record Size Compare
Message-ID: <20090202104619.17580b2b@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E651DB@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E651DB@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hmm, well, except for Read-concurrent test, setting 128K record size is
a no-brainer.  I'm slightly curious what it means to run the clients
"individually".  If the clients run their tests one at a time, it would
not seem to make a difference how many there are.

On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:32:58 -0800 Patrick Haverty
<patrick.haverty@onstor.com> wrote:

> I created two volumes (raidz 5+1), each with one folder, on the
> Leopard system.  One of the folders was created with the default
> record size set to 16K and the other was left at the default record
> size of 128K.  Each folder was mounted by two clients and the tests
> were ran with all clients running concurrent and also each running
> individually.  I ran the tests three times and the averages of those
> runs are charted here.  The test are all sequential using 16k blocks
> running dd.
> 
> I plan to chart the sio random access test results as time allows,
> but for now....Enjoy the Super Bowl.
