AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090204124835.4a096f1e@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:exch1.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<richard.lareau@onstor.com>,<ben.piela@onstor.com>,<dl-cstech@onstor.com>,<paul.negus@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E65A53@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:48:43 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Rich LaReau <richard.lareau@onstor.com>
Cc: Ben Piela <ben.piela@onstor.com>, dl-cstech <dl-cstech@onstor.com>, Paul
 Negus <paul.negus@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Cougar with Two prom versions
Message-ID: <20090204124843.2bd48892@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E65A53@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E65659@exch1.onstor.net>
	<2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E65A48@exch1.onstor.net>
	<20090204122919.26a82af5@ripper.onstor.net>
	<2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB51851E65A53@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I don't think it's that simple.  We need to get to the bottom of the
story with this board.  There are memory configuration changes in 1.0.9
for the 1480s that should be used.  Then there is also the matter of
the link speed of the management ethernet ports.  There's probably
others I don't remember.

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:35:00 -0800 Rich LaReau
<richard.lareau@onstor.com> wrote:

> 
> Sandrine reports that there is no problem running the two versions
> together.  (They are two 1U Cougars.)  Whether the 1.08 code should
> be upgraded to 1.09 depends on which fixes are required.
> 
> Rich 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:29 PM
> To: Ben Piela
> Cc: Rich LaReau; dl-cstech; Paul Negus
> Subject: Re: Cougar with Two prom versions
> 
> That's pretty bizarre, I don't actually remember that we released a
> 1.0.8 prom version, but there is very important stuff in 1.0.9 that
> they should have, in the TXRX and FP prom images as well as the SSC
> prom image. So they should all have 1.0.9.  I'm hard pressed to
> figure how this happened exactly.  Perhaps the whole motherboard is
> down rev'd.  I would check with Ops to see if you can figure that out
> by the serial number.
> 
> CC'ing Paul.
> 
> 
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:20:29 -0800 Ben Piela <ben.piela@onstor.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Any Cougar masters out there that might have an answer for this or
> > at least an informed opinion?  The customer has a cougar 3310 HA
> > pair, one node has Cougar prom version 1.0.9 and the other has
> > 1.0.8.
> > 
> > Thanks much.
> > 
> > Ben Piela
> > ben.piela@onstor.com
> > Mobile: (201) 819-9537
> > Office: (201) 251-1167
> > 
> > From: Rich LaReau
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:06 PM
> > To: dl-cstech
> > Subject: Cougar with Two prom versions
> > 
> > Ben's got a Cougar running two different prom versions on the
> > blades. Is that a problem?
> > 
> > Rich
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Ben Piela
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:55 AM
> > To: Rich LaReau
> > Subject: Case 11161 - FCHS
> > Rich,
> > 
> > I finished working with Victor Chan in upgrading their Cougar
> > cluster to 4.0.1.0, the GA release.  Afterwards, I noticed that the
> > two nodes were running at a different version of the prom.  One
> > node is at 1.0.8 and one is at 1.0.9.  Not sure how this happened.
> > Can something bad happen because of this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > [cid:image001.gif@01C986DC.1CEEA9E0]
> > Ben Piela
> > Senior Sales Engineer
> > 
> > ONStor, Inc.
> > office: 201.251.1167
> > fax: 201.445.2820
> > mobile: 201.819.9537
> > ben.piela@onstor.com<mailto:ben.piela@onstor.com>
> > http://www.onstor.com<http://www.onstor.com/>
> > 
