AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090417121500.49192d23@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<John.Keiffer@onstor.com>,<andy.pinkard@onstor.com>,<patrick.haverty@onstor.com>,<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>,<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31284F9B63A@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:15:35 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: John Keiffer <John.Keiffer@onstor.com>
Cc: Andy Pinkard <andy.pinkard@onstor.com>, Patrick Haverty
 <patrick.haverty@onstor.com>, Sandrine Boulanger
 <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>, Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: anon smb access
Message-ID: <20090417121535.7e0bf919@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31284F9B63A@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31284F9B63A@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:53:01 -0700 John Keiffer
<John.Keiffer@onstor.com> wrote:

> 1)       Pat installed the 'stable' ISO on Leopard-1.
> 2)       Smb access didn't work, and the kernel version still said 1.1.6
> 3)       I changed the repository so I could 'upgrade', and I upgraded
> 4)       Smb access still didn't work, but kernel version looked better
> 5)       I changed the repository to 'unstable' and I upgraded. Only the 3 nexenta pieces appeared to change and no reboot was required.


Ouch.  Can you tell me what those were?  The stable version that I've
built should be exactly what was built for the unstable.  I certainly
didn't change anything.  It's possible that I'm missing a step or
something like that, however.  Like, maybe I'm supposed to change
something but don't know it.


> 6)       After that, I could access the smb share.
> 
> I have not tested permissions yet though. I'm just trying to provide info for Andy.

The help is much appreciated, believe me.

Cheers,

a

> 
> Thank you,
> John Keiffer
> 
> 
