AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<John.Keiffer@onstor.com>,<andy.pinkard@onstor.com>,<patrick.haverty@onstor.com>,<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>,<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31284F9B642@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:09:49 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: John Keiffer <John.Keiffer@onstor.com>
Cc: Andy Pinkard <andy.pinkard@onstor.com>, Patrick Haverty
 <patrick.haverty@onstor.com>, Sandrine Boulanger
 <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>, Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: anon smb access
Message-ID: <20090417160949.7e61c6d6@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31284F9B642@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31284F9B63A@exch1.onstor.net>
	<20090417121535.7e0bf919@ripper.onstor.net>
	<102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31284F9B642@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yup, thanks.

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:21:07 -0700 John Keiffer
<John.Keiffer@onstor.com> wrote:

> 
> This is what I saw when executing step 5 in my email before. Is this what you wanted to see?
> 
> nmc@Leopard-1:/$ setup appliance upgrade -y
> Checking repository sources. Please wait...
> Found new upgrades/packages!
> Verifying upgrades...
> Trying to gain exclusive access to the appliance.
> This operation may take up to 30 seconds to complete. Please wait...
> Exclusive access granted.
> Initiating appliance upgrade procedure. Please wait...
> Success. This upgrade will download approximately 27.40MB
> Downloading upgrades. This may take a few minutes. Please wait...
> Upgrade is in progress. Please DO NOT interrupt...
> Creating Rollback Checkpoint...
> 
> Rollback Checkpoint has been created: rootfs-nmu-003
> 
> Use NMC 'show appliance checkpoint' command to list all available
> system checkpoints
> 
> (Reading database ... 34289 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace nmdtrace 0.3 (using .../nmdtrace_0.3_solaris-i386.deb) ...
> Stopping NMDTRACE service... done
> Waiting for NMDTRACE to shutdown... done
> Unpacking replacement nmdtrace ...
> Preparing to replace nms 1.1.7-1 (using .../nms_1.1.7-1_solaris-i386.deb) ...
> Stopping NMS service... done
> Waiting for NMS to shutdown... done
> Unpacking replacement nms ...
> Preparing to replace nmv 1.1.7-1 (using .../nmv_1.1.7-1_solaris-i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement nmv ...
> Setting up nmdtrace (0.3) ...
> Starting NMDTRACE service... done
> Waiting for NMDTRACE to come up... done
> 
> Setting up nms (1.1.7-1) ...
> Starting NMS service... done
> Waiting for NMS to come up... done
> 
> Setting up nmv (1.1.7-1) ...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:16 PM
> To: John Keiffer
> Cc: Andy Pinkard; Patrick Haverty; Sandrine Boulanger; Brian Stark
> Subject: Re: anon smb access
> 
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:53:01 -0700 John Keiffer
> <John.Keiffer@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > 1)       Pat installed the 'stable' ISO on Leopard-1.
> > 2)       Smb access didn't work, and the kernel version still said 1.1.6
> > 3)       I changed the repository so I could 'upgrade', and I upgraded
> > 4)       Smb access still didn't work, but kernel version looked better
> > 5)       I changed the repository to 'unstable' and I upgraded. Only the 3 nexenta pieces appeared to change and no reboot was required.
> 
> 
> Ouch.  Can you tell me what those were?  The stable version that I've
> built should be exactly what was built for the unstable.  I certainly
> didn't change anything.  It's possible that I'm missing a step or
> something like that, however.  Like, maybe I'm supposed to change
> something but don't know it.
> 
> 
> > 6)       After that, I could access the smb share.
> > 
> > I have not tested permissions yet though. I'm just trying to provide info for Andy.
> 
> The help is much appreciated, believe me.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> a
> 
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > John Keiffer
> > 
> > 
