AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090422093727.62f3bfd8@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:37:57 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Maxim Kozlovsky <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
Subject: quick question about our network aggregation
Message-ID: <20090422093757.3fa418c6@ripper.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This statement came up recently and my first reaction was that it isn't
true, but I thought I would ask you just to confirm: we can't aggregate
our network throughput to a single client?  Is that true?  I assumed
that if we aggregate all 4 ports to the switch, then a single client
connected to that switch with 10GigE would be able to get the full
aggregated throughput.