AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090423132045.66413268@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>,<Arnaldo.Roldan@onstor.com>,<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB3128503D6A8@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:20:59 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Larry Scheer <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Roldan <Arnaldo.Roldan@onstor.com>, Brian Stark
 <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Debian or Ubuntu?
Message-ID: <20090423132059.64fa2112@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB3128503D6A8@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31284F9B994@exch1.onstor.net>
	<102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB3128503D6A8@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Although my intial reaction would be to use Ubuntu, I have to respect
the person who's done the work and back his recommendation.


On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:12:25 -0700 Larry Scheer
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> As you know I use both Debian and Ubuntu in my office. I have had time to evaluate each as a desktop build system. Both are very fine development systems. However I feel Debian is the better choice for ONStor at this time. 
> 
> The reason I would select Debian is because it is less bleeding-edge than Ubuntu. After I loaded our cross-build tools on a Ubuntu system I could not upgrade it properly to the next release of Ubuntu and I had to do a complete re-install from CD to get to the next release. Which means I had to pain-stakingly reinstall all of my cross-build packages. Some I had to rebuild due to glibc issues.
> 
> If we start with Debian etch we will have a stable desktop system that is running the same OS as our filers. Installing the cross-tool-chain and upgrading packages are a snap.
> 
> The reason we have to start with Debian etch and not lenny is because lenny uses newer a newer glibc that is incompatible with the unit tests we need to build for Cougar. Andy assures me when we move to the TUXRX version of the Cougar we will no longer have this restriction. However, that will more likely be a 2010 reality than 2009.
> 
> Once again my recommendation for Linux desktop is Debian etch.
> 
> I welcome any other comment or discussion.
> ________________________________________
> From: Arnaldo Roldan
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:10 PM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Subject: Debian or Ubuntu?
> 
> Larry,
> 
> Hope you are feeling better. I have a question for you but it is in no way an urgent matter.
> 
> For various reasons I would like to start putting together a new Linux system image for Engineering and I am contemplating using Debian or Ubuntu. My understanding is that the framework for doing builds will have an influence on what this new image should look like and to that end wanted to start a dialogue with you and possibly others to determine what would best meet our needs.
> 
> When you get a moment would you tell me your thoughts as to how well you think Debian or Ubuntu would work as our development environment?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Arnaldo
> 
