AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070413151150.0473028b@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02215731@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:12:12 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Min compact disk size
Message-ID: <20070413151212.44336ee2@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02215731@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02215731@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Of course, but shhhh, don't tell anyone.  I want Caeli (sp?)to freak out
first.  Or Sandrine.  I'll settle for either one.

Cheers,

a


On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:46:01 -0700 "Larry Scheer"
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> Looking at the disk format routines, that flash I have that is 488
> disk blocks is too small to be used in our systems now. However, it
> is a flash that worked perfectly fine with the old
> flash_install_512.sh and system copy init.  Since we hit this problem
> in house with an existing flash in one of our systems isn't it highly
> probable we will see this problem in the field?
> 
> Shouldn't CF_SIZE_MIN be relaxed to 488 from 490?
> 
> L.
