AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090615133009.71c3f26e@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>,<John.Keiffer@onstor.com>,<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>,<patrick.haverty@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31370B1E82F@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:30:14 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Larry Scheer <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Cc: John Keiffer <John.Keiffer@onstor.com>, Sandrine Boulanger
 <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>, Patrick Haverty
 <patrick.haverty@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: regression?
Message-ID: <20090615133014.4e2101c9@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31370B1E82F@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31370ABBC80@exch1.onstor.net>
	<102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31370B1E82F@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I guarantee that this has not changed.  The messages are coming from
the kernel and can't be changed without patching the kernel (not even
sure that's still possible these days) or rebuilding the kernel.  At
one point I was hoping that it came from grub but it isn't.

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:49:40 -0700 Larry Scheer
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> John,
>    I just completed a rigorous check of the code and looked at some
> diffs of suspect code between the current version versus what we
> released in April and I did not find the messages you are reporting
> as regressions.
> 
> I think we are left with rolling back to 1.1.7 and proving once and
> for all if this in indeed a regression. Those messages sure do look
> like they are coming from the OpenSolaris kernel to me.
> 
> Larry
> 
> ________________________________
> From: John Keiffer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:28 PM
> To: Larry Scheer; Andy Sharp
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger; Patrick Haverty
> Subject: RE: regression?
> 
> Maybe Andy helped with this before?
> 
> If needed (I really don't want to) I could roll back to 1.1.7 and try
> it out for you...
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:24 PM
> To: John Keiffer
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger; Patrick Haverty
> Subject: RE: regression?
> 
> I just searched the code for the text string "Loading" and
> "NexentaOS_" and I did not find Loading Nexenta... and anything that
> matched NexentaOS_.
> 
> I am nearly convinced these messages are coming from the Kernel
> modules which I do not build. I say nearly because I will continue to
> poke around to see if they are not buried somewhere else in the code.
> 
> Larry
> 
> ________________________________
> From: John Keiffer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:10 PM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger; Patrick Haverty
> Subject: RE: regression?
> 
> I'd just have to roll back my system to 1.1.7. I'm very sure about
> this.
> 
> Pat, do you agree that this was fixed on the shipping product?
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:09 PM
> To: John Keiffer
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: RE: regression?
> 
> Are you VERY sure this is not the kernel boot message?
> 
> Can you provide me with the 1.1.7 message?
> 
> ________________________________
> From: John Keiffer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:07 PM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: RE: regression?
> 
> I am VERY sure this is a regression. ;-)
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:06 PM
> To: John Keiffer
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: RE: regression?
> 
> I will still look into this, but I don't think this is a regression.
> One thing we were not (and still not) able to change is the boot
> message coming from the kernel. This appears to be that message.
> 
> Larry
> ________________________________
> From: John Keiffer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:01 PM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: RE: regression?
> 
> 26939 entered.
> 
> Dmesg was useless, but /var/log/messages had this:
> 
> Jun 15 09:54:58 Leopard-1 genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] aoed114
> is /pseudo/aoed@114 Jun 15 09:59:17 Leopard-1 poweroff: [ID 500860
> auth.crit] initiated by root Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 genunix: [ID
> 540533 kern.notice] ^MSunOS Release 5.11 Version NexentaOS_20081207
> 64-bit Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 genunix: [ID 184123 kern.notice]
> Loading Nexenta... Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 unix: [ID 126719
> kern.info] features:
> 71ff6fff<cpuid,sse4a,mwait,tscp,cmp,cx16,sse3,nx,asysc,sse2,sse,pat,cx8,pae,mca,mmx,cmov,de,pge,mtrr,msr,tsc,lgpg>
> Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 unix: [ID 168242 kern.info] mem = 8382720K
> (0x1ffa40000) Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 unix: [ID 972737 kern.info]
> Skipping psm: xpv_psm Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 rootnex: [ID 466748
> kern.info] root nexus = i86pc Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 iommulib: [ID
> 321598 kern.info] NOTICE: iommulib_nexus_register: rootnex-1:
> Succesfully registered NEXUS i86pc nexops=fffffffffbceeb10 Jun 15
> 10:03:02 Leopard-1 rootnex: [ID 349649 kern.info] pseudo0 at root Jun
> 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pseudo0
> is /pseudo Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 rootnex: [ID 349649 kern.info]
> scsi_vhci0 at root Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1 genunix: [ID 936769
> kern.info] scsi_vhci0 is /scsi_vhci Jun 15 10:03:02 Leopard-1
> rootnex: [ID 349649 kern.info] isa0 at root
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:46 AM
> To: John Keiffer
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: RE: regression?
> 
> Yes they might be. Please file a bug in ClearQuest and assign it to
> me.
> 
> I had to merge many changes and I was concerned that I did not catch
> all of these things. Nexenta started using variables instead of
> hard-coding using hard coded values for these types of things which
> is what we always wanted. However, it may have reverted some work
> that was done in the last release.
> 
> 
> Can you capture the complete console message or look at dmesg and
> send met the rest of the text around these messages? That will help
> me narrow down the code that prints these strings.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Larry
> 
> ________________________________
> From: John Keiffer
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:38 AM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: regression?
> 
> Larry,
> 
> When a 1.1.9 system boots we are seeing this on the console:
> 
> "SunOS Leopard-1 5.11 NexentaOS_20081207 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
> Loading Nexenta..."
> 
> Are both those Nexenta references regressions?
> 
> Thank you,
> John Keiffer
> 
> 
