AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090706112818.46299b5a@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377AF638B@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:28:28 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Does anyone use this set of SDM utilities?
Message-ID: <20090706112828.7bb55387@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377AF638B@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377A2668E@exch1.onstor.net>
	<102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377AF638B@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

sure, do a p4 delete on them

On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:21:47 -0700 Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>
wrote:

> I previously used these a long time ago just to get traffic going on
> the FC links.  However, as far as I'm concerned, nfsperftest has
> obsoleted these tests, so they can be removed...
>=20
>=20
> ________________________________
> From: Jonathan Goldick
> Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 1:55 PM
> To: dl-Engineering; dl-esc-l3; dl-Operations
> Subject: Does anyone use this set of SDM utilities?
>=20
> /onstor/bin/read  Does direct reads on a LUN without any safety
> checks.  Accessible via the diag-level nfxsh CLI as =E2=80=9Cdisk
> read=E2=80=9D /onstor/bin/write  Does direct writes on a LUN without any
> safety checks.  Accessible via the diag-level nfxsh CLI as =E2=80=9Cdisk
> erase=E2=80=9D /onstor/bin/wrv    Does direct writes on a LUN without any
> safety checks and verifies results.  No CLI access for this command.
> Perhaps operations uses this but I thought they did not test with
> real disks.
>=20
> If there is no usage of this ancient code I=E2=80=99d like to remove it as
> dead code, rather than attempt to make it safe to use.
>=20
>=20
