AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090710230331.1f4dd5c9@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>,<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,<Arnaldo.Roldan@onstor.com>,<Ron.Whitham@onstor.com>,<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377A3D4DD@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:04:30 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Larry Scheer <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Cc: Maxim Kozlovsky <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>, Arnaldo Roldan
 <Arnaldo.Roldan@onstor.com>, Ron Whitham <Ron.Whitham@onstor.com>, Brian
 Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: engineering workstation
Message-ID: <20090710230430.0609f769@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377A3D4DD@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <2779531E7C760D4491C96305019FEEB52AD1D76D50@exch1.onstor.net>
	<102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377A3D4DD@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:40:54 -0700 Larry Scheer
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> Good news, I found out why a make release for the bobcats was not
> working on this new workstation and I have a Makefile fix for it.
> 
> The bad news is make test gets lots of compile errors due to the
> nature of the64 bit user space on this system.
> 
> Some compile errors are:
> 
>  sm-eee/eee-desc.h:161: error: size of array
> 'nfx_compileTimeAssertion' is negative. 
> 
> authen-lib.c:2736: error: passing argument 2 of 'fgetln' from
> incompatible pointer type
> 
> fs.c: In function 'ensure_dir_exists':
> fs.c:704: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size
> 
> ncm-api.c:900: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size
> 
> rmc.c:2751: error: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has
> type 'long unsigned int'
> 
> There are a bunch of other format errors expecting type 'int' but has
> type 'long unsigned int'. I think e_log is one of them plus some
> cluster logging functions.

These are all bugs that can be fixed easily, and should be fixed.  I
went through something similar when building the prom code on a 64 bit
machine:  the time has come.  Etcetera and so forth.

> Just a quick not to let you know the latest status.

A quick not?  Knot?

Thanks for the update.  I'm very glad that we're making progess on
this, largely due to the efforts of yourself and Arnaldo and Ron.
With the occassional nudge from Max and me ~:^)

Thanks guys.

Cheers,

a

> Larry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxim Kozlovsky 
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:38 AM
> To: Larry Scheer; Arnaldo Roldan; Ron Whitham; Andy Sharp
> Cc: Brian Stark; Jonathan Goldick
> Subject: RE: engineering workstation
> 
> Does "make test" work?
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Larry Scheer
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:49 PM
> >To: Arnaldo Roldan; Ron Whitham; Andy Sharp
> >Cc: Maxim Kozlovsky; Brian Stark; Jonathan Goldick
> >Subject: RE: engineering workstation
> >
> >Everyone,
> >   I just wanted to give you a progress update on the engineering
> >workstation.
> >
> >I have all the packages installed and make install_toolchain works on
> >Debian systems. I am waiting for Andy to review my changes and I
> >will check in code and packages.
> >
> >I was able to successfully build the cougar product (make
> >PROD=cg ... and make release PROD=cg ...)
> >
> >I was able to build the nfx-tree for bobcat but a make release
> >PROD=bc fails. There seem to be problems with running the bsdmake
> >found in boot- tools with this hardware and Debian release. I am
> >attempting to rebuild bsdmake and boot-tools for this platform but I
> >ran into compile errors.
> >
> >I will keep plugging away at this to see if I can get the bobcat make
> >release to work. I won't attempt to get a build of OpenBSD to work.
> >There are too many issues to bother trying that. Besides we have
> >several systems that can build it successfully.
> >
> >I just thought you would like a progress report.
> >
> >Once I get the bobcat build to complete the next step would be
> >having Jan or someone verify the automated test tools work. Which
> >reminds me, I need to build an amd64 version of the tap library
> >package and install it on engtest0.
> >
> >Larry
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Arnaldo Roldan
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 4:59 PM
> >To: Ron Whitham; Andy Sharp
> >Cc: Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky
> >Subject: RE: engineering workstation
> >
> >Larry,
> >
> >We await your prognosis. Thanks,
> >
> >Arnaldo
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Ron Whitham
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:34 PM
> >To: Andy Sharp; Arnaldo Roldan
> >Cc: Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky
> >Subject: RE: engineering workstation
> >
> >engtest0 has been reinstalled with an amd64 build.
> >same login info as before:
> >ssh://10.0.0.61
> >root // onstor
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Andy Sharp
> >Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:18 PM
> >To: Arnaldo Roldan
> >Cc: Larry Scheer; Ron Whitham; Maxim Kozlovsky
> >Subject: engineering workstation
> >
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I just noticed that engtest0 is i386, but it needs to be amd64,
> >which is the arch flavor that should be used on all x86_64 hardware,
> >either from AMD or Intel.
> >
> >Not sure why I didn't notice this before, my bad really.  It will
> >have to be reinstalled, sorry.
> >
> >a
> >
> >engtest0:~$ dpkg --print-architecture
> >i386
> >engtest0:~$
