AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090714131815.616e1588@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377A3D4E5@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:18:48 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Larry Scheer <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: rootfs for 402 branch
Message-ID: <20090714131848.207dccdc@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377A3D4E5@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <20090714094506.5165f437@ripper.onstor.net>
	<102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB31377A3D4E5@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The rootfs' are definitely different, but, yeah, I was wrong about why
the build broke.  No biggy.  I should have noticed that there was a
package missing from the checkin?  Or was that a different issue?

Your note to everyone said compile3 had the wrong build package
installed; does that mean nightly build is on compile3 or ?  I thought
it was on k3 or something.

Anyway, thanks for taking care of it so quickly!

BTW, FYI, TLA, once we go to the new workstation, there is an
optimization for building the tarball/filesystem that will reduce that
process from 10 minutes to 1 minute!  Yay!

Cheers,

a

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:10:35 -0700 Larry Scheer
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> If I am that is because there are no differences between the rootfs. 
> 
> I do need to rebuild the rootfs for both r402 and dev. I just haven't
> gotten to that task, yet.
> 
> No that was not the reason the Nighlty build broke. You probably saw
> the reason why the build broke from my previous emails. The build is
> now fixed.
> 
> Larry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:45 AM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Subject: rootfs for 402 branch
> 
> You're using the rootfs built from dev branch for 402 branch?
> Naughty!  I assume that's why the nightly build of 402 is broken along
> with dev, since I don't recall you integrating those changes you
> checked in to the 402 branch.
