AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20090729103226.635a4d9c@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:mail.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>,<ed.kwan@onstor.com>,<brian.stark@onstor.com>,<rendell.fong@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@exch1.onstor.net/INBOX	0	102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB3137CE2BA5C@exch1.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:34:01 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Sandrine Boulanger <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
Cc: Ed Kwan <ed.kwan@onstor.com>, Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>,
 Rendell Fong <rendell.fong@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: SSC crash dump change
Message-ID: <20090729103401.4ddc7115@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB3137CE2BA5C@exch1.onstor.net>
References: <20090729100050.77fc538b@ripper.onstor.net>
	<102AB4F33EBBDB4C91915B145C8E9FB3137CE2BA5C@exch1.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:16:53 -0700 Sandrine Boulanger
<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com> wrote:

> What's 4.0.3?

Hey, I don't know, nobody tells me.  I just know that's the current
version number in the dev branch, and it usually corresponds with the
current or upcoming release version number.

> Do we have a write-up on the ssc crashdump, how to read
> it, collect it? Don't we have a branch for that project or is
> everything dumped in dev branch, which is mostly untested?

What project are you referring to?  While this started out in tuxrx,
what's checked into dev branch is all cougar-ific.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 10:01 AM
> To: Ed Kwan
> Cc: Brian Stark; Rendell Fong; Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: SSC crash dump change
> 
> Hello troops,
> 
> Rendell has checked in the SSC crash dump functionality to the dev
> branch. It hasn't been tested by QA, but I thought I would heads-up
> folks so that they can work on deciding what to do with it wrt 4.0.3.
> And yes, Rendell has tested it ~:^).  I know we want to get this out
> into the field at some point.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> a
