AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Dave.Limato@lsi.com>,<Ed.Kwan@lsi.com>,<Andy.Sharp@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	D7A889C980962746B30DE07864593C02C7AAB24A@cosmail02.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:48:07 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Limato, Dave" <Dave.Limato@lsi.com>
Cc: "Kwan, Ed" <Ed.Kwan@lsi.com>, "Sharp, Andy" <Andy.Sharp@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: TuxStor in CQ
Message-ID: <20090828134807.5b4b953c@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <D7A889C980962746B30DE07864593C02C7AAB24A@cosmail02.lsi.com>
References: <D7A889C980962746B30DE07864593C02C7AAB24A@cosmail02.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:14:11 -0600 "Limato, Dave" <Dave.Limato@lsi.com>
wrote:

> I have For Project of TuxStor now, and I am moving those Kegg P1/2
> from yesterday into that bucket. The question I have is do we want a
> TuxStor project now for new defects. Its in there, let me know if it
> should stay.  Are we ready to add TuxStor to the dropdown list for
> new defects? Dave

Sure, no time like the present.  Then it will be there for when we
actually are able to find bugs in it, which will be the year 2222.