AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Brian.Stark@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	E1EC65251D4B3D46BBC0AAA3C0629222A90B8239@cosmail02.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:36:28 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Stark, Brian" <Brian.Stark@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: TuxStor schedule v1
Message-ID: <20090929113628.31e12b86@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <E1EC65251D4B3D46BBC0AAA3C0629222A90B8239@cosmail02.lsi.com>
References: <E1EC65251D4B3D46BBC0AAA3C0629222A90B8239@cosmail02.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

One thing that seems to be missing is the first task on the spreadsheet
that I sent out:

Task#   Description
Person   Hours

1	Develop/Test/Integrate SSC/TuxRx daemons into TuxStor
Linux	Rendell/Andy	320		320																											

On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:41:40 -0600 "Stark, Brian" <Brian.Stark@lsi.com>
wrote:

> I've updated the TuxStor schedule based on the feedback from
> yesterday's meeting.  I've attached the Project file and a pdf and
> would like to get feedback on this by the end of the week.  The key
> dates are getting to task 36 Dev Unit tests, which then drives task
> 39 Phase 1 Integration.  After this, we are then ready for QA.
> 
> By building in holiday times and also making nfsperftest a
> pre-requisite for entering QA for Phase 1, the date is pushed out to
> the middle of June.  This is a little too close for comfort, and I'd
> like to see if we can pull it back in to May.  The long pole appears
> to be the virtual server work, so maybe nfsperftest without
> networking can start before virtual server work is completed.  This
> is just a suggestion, and keep in mind that my primary goal here is
> to create an accurate schedule that we can deliver on.
> 
> Take a look at tasks and durations in particular.  As a reminder I'd
> like to get tasks down to 1-2 week intervals, so add more detail to
> tasks that are currently longer.
> 
> After I receive feedback, I'll work up another version and then we
> can meet early next week.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
