AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070425113720.2c65eac5@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<tim.gardner@onstor.com>,<larry.scheer@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E036D2FE5@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:39:59 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>
Cc: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Delorean installation proposal 57
Message-ID: <20070425113959.4611a4c6@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E036D2FE5@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E036D2FE5@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:09:08 -0700 "Tim Gardner"
<tim.gardner@onstor.com> wrote:

> Jerry has called another meeting to discuss delorean installation
> options.
> At this meeting he wants to discuss the option of running an
> installation program that
> can be started and then run unattended. The meeting is Monday
> afternoon. Before then I need this option to be scoped. We need to
> have a rough proposal of
> how this would work, what the user experience would be, and how long
> it would take
> to build and test. Lets meet at 2pm today to discuss.

If this is Jerry's idea, I'm happy to let him do the implementation
work.  Obviously we are so dumb we never thought of this before.
Additionally, we wouldn't have to do any scoping work either.

Sorry to be so insolent, but really my patience is wearing thin.  We
should have Caeli and possibly Paul at this Monday meeting with Jerry
too, because a lot of constraints have been imposed on us by internal
customers, and I'm tired of Jerry giving the 'yeah-right' eye rolling
look when we mention that this or that option was ruled out because of
those constraints.  Like the notion mentioned in this email.

Cheers,

a
