AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Ed.Kwan@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	83400AF4C53F4C459BBD76A9E4268B6C0DF9CF@cosmail02.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:35:01 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Kwan, Ed" <Ed.Kwan@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: any updates on TED 27247 SiByte Watchdog message after Bobcat
 to Cougar configuration transition
Message-ID: <20091009093501.30d36347@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <83400AF4C53F4C459BBD76A9E4268B6C0DF9CF@cosmail02.lsi.com>
References: <83400AF4C53F4C459BBD76A9E4268B6C0DF9CF@cosmail02.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:55:23 -0600 "Kwan, Ed" <Ed.Kwan@lsi.com> wrote:

> Can we give this defect higher priority?  We continue to see this
> problem in the field.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rendell Fong [mailto:Rendell.Fong@lsi.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 1:33 PM
> To: Kwan, Ed
> Subject: Re: any updates on TED 27247 SiByte Watchdog message after
> Bobcat to Cougar configuration transition
> 
> No, I haven't investigated it.

I'm investigating it.  Nothing yet, although I've got some code that is
close to being testable.  Please note that this message can occur for
many different bugs.  The case I'm looking at is the one that is
happening to Abdallah's machine in the lab.