AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com>,<Richard.Hardiman@lsi.com>,<Theresa.Than@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4B7042B@cosmail01.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:33:45 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Gollotti, Michael" <Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com>
Cc: "Hardiman, Richard" <Richard.Hardiman@lsi.com>, "Than, Theresa"
 <Theresa.Than@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: Need Relocate Remaining Lab Routes Onto the New Cisco Switch
 from 10.0.0.1
Message-ID: <20091102103345.16bd6d5b@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4B7042B@cosmail01.lsi.com>
References: <B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4B7042B@cosmail01.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:13:48 -0700 "Gollotti, Michael"
<Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com> wrote:

> There are several IP routes that are still routing through the
> 10.0.0.1 switch that need to be configured onto the new Cisco switch
> from within the lab.
> 
> Downtime should be minimal (approximately 10 minute downtime to
> shutdown 10.0.0.1, configure routes as primary and secondary on the
> new Cisco switch, and test connectivity).
> 
> Please let me know a good time that we can do this.

Hi Michael,

I hate to assume, so I need to get clarification on what's going on
and what you're proposing to do.

You're currently running traffic that routes through 10.0.0.1 through
the cisco?  By that I mean it's going first to the HP and that is just
sending all of it to the cisco?  So what you're saying is that it's
redundant as well as you want to ditch the HP, so we just need to
switch those lab machines over to the new gateway address?

I realize I don't see the whole solar system, but from my little spot
on earth it would seem reasonable that you can just have the cisco take
over the 10.0.0.1 address.  Is that possible?  Do you want to do that?
I don't care either way, I'd just rather not have to change the config
on a bunch of machines multiple times if you're planning on doing that
at some point.  In other words, if you just want to leave the default
gateway as 10.0.0.104 or 19 or whatever it is now, I'm fine with that.
We can track down and change the config on whatever machines need it.

Lot of questions, I know.

Cheers,

a
