AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<bill.fisher@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:05:22 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: Bill Fisher <bill.fisher@lsi.com>
Subject: kernel build - please review 33334
Message-ID: <20091102140522.5f6eabd2@ripper.onstor.net>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Bill,

I have a fix for some of the issues with the kernel build in this
changelist, so I'd like to get a review from you.

I believe you have two issues you would like to bring up/have me
address, etc.

One is ... I don't remember, something about comments.  Please tell me
which comments, where, and what you don't like and what it should look
like after I fix it.  Be brief.  Be technical.

The other is the acpu.  Please tell me what you want done on that.

There remains one more thing: neteee/neteee.c builds with 2 undefined
symbols: eee_rcv_pkt and eee_txrxIsPktToNcpu_kernel.  I'd like to fix
that in this changelist -- if possible -- but I'd like a recommendation
from you on how to handle it.  Can I comment the function calls out for
now?  Is there something better I should do?

If I can get this changelist squared away today or tomorrow we can claim
at least for a few days that the kernel builds, and then maybe get Max
out of our hair.

