AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	1257383524.29384.97.camel@rendellf
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:06:39 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: Rendell Fong <Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: tuxstor kernel build
Message-ID: <20091105110639.341a9d49@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <1257383524.29384.97.camel@rendellf>
References: <20091104162903.4a480d11@ripper.onstor.net>
	<1257381529.29384.96.camel@rendellf>
	<20091104165043.0d11f907@ripper.onstor.net>
	<1257383524.29384.97.camel@rendellf>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:12:04 -0700 Rendell Fong <Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:50 -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:38:49 -0700 Rendell Fong
> > <Rendell.Fong@lsi.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Have you changed all the CONFIG_ONSTOR_TUXRX refs in nfx-tree src
> > > files?
> 
> It will probably be the next thing to complain about.

We'll see.  But then, he will actually have to do something in order to
find out.  That's progress ~:^)

> > 
> > Nope.
> > 
> > But those are in the module.  Max didn't say anything about the txrx
> > kernel module.
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:29 -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > > > Just so we're clear amongst ourselves, there was *nothing*
> > > > special in my checkin that makes the kernel build.  It included
> > > > two changes from the dev branch that weren't in the tuxrx
> > > > branch yet, but those weren't affecting the build, they were
> > > > affecting the functioning.
> > > > 
> > > > All one had to do to get the kernel to build before my checkin
> > > > was comment out by hand a couple of function calls to eliminate
> > > > a couple of undefined symbols, which is pretty close to what I
> > > > did.
> > > > 
> > > > If something is broken (I did boot test it) by doing that, then
> > > > we will have to wait for Bill's stuff because the special sauce
> > > > is in there. But this won't be a completely uncommon occurrance
> > > > due to the stage of development we're in.  Bill, Rendell and I
> > > > seem to be completely unphased by it for some reason.
> > > 
> 
