AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com>,<Rich.Miller@lsi.com>,<Michael.Anido@lsi.com>,<Rocco.Cappolella@lsi.com>,<Theresa.Than@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4CB344C@cosmail01.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:08:24 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Gollotti, Michael" <Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com>
Cc: "Miller, Richard K (Rich)" <Rich.Miller@lsi.com>, "Anido, Michael"
 <Michael.Anido@lsi.com>, "Cappolella, Rocco (Rocco)"
 <Rocco.Cappolella@lsi.com>, "Than, Theresa" <Theresa.Than@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: Pleasanton
Message-ID: <20091112150824.75730a01@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4CB344C@cosmail01.lsi.com>
References: <B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4CB344C@cosmail01.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Michael,

I think a meeting with me and Rich is all that's needed.  Quite frankly
I'm hoping we can just stick a NATing router in there and be done with
it, or maybe a minor change, the the class B number or something, but
we can toss all that around when we get together.

Cheers,

a

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:48:19 -0700 "Gollotti, Michael"
<Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
> 
> This is a follow up message that I sent to you a few days ago WRT
> beginning discussions on changing the IP scopes in Pleasanton so that
> we can implement the new MPLS link up at Campbell.  We are now also
> working on getting phone service re-established at Pleasanton site as
> well with Nortel VoIP phones.
> 
> Please let us know who we will need to get involved so that a meeting
> can be scheduled to begin process of migrating Pleasanton to a new IP
> range (same IP range is in use at an existing LSI site which is
> holding up implementation of the MPLS link) and getting the Nortel
> VoIP phones placed into service.
> 
> Regards,
> Michael-
> 
