AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4D1FFCC@cosmail01.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:47:56 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Gollotti, Michael" <Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: New Subnet for Pleasanton and Implementation Plan
Message-ID: <20091117164756.7f3ae208@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4D1FFCC@cosmail01.lsi.com>
References: <B50ED5C0A7967343B07C1764EE1D7BD1F4D1FFCC@cosmail01.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Michael,

On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:39:20 -0700 "Gollotti, Michael"
<Michael.Gollotti@lsi.com> wrote:

> New subnet for Pleasanton has been configured in Pleasanton:
> 
> Subnet: 135.149.42.0/24 (VLAN 42)
> 
> PLEASANTON
> 
> Vlan 42 has been configured on the Pleasanton switch (10.1.1.1)
> 
> Vlan 42
> Ip address 135.149.42.1 255.255.255.0
> Ip helper address 147.145.120.19 (Infoblox)
> Ip helper address 147.145.12.11 (Infoblox)
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
OK, I'll play your silly game, what does that phrase mean? ~:^)

> 
> Campbell
> 
> Static IP route configured on 10.0.0.104 (Cisco 6509):
> 
> Ip route 135.149.42.0 255.255.255.0 66.201.51.115
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't recognize this IP address.  Is this the Campbell endpoint on the
P-t-P 5 Mbit line to Pleasanton?

> Rocco - Please configure VPN for this subnet through to Milpitas when
> you get in tomorrow morning so that we can have someone in Pleasanton
> test to see if the phone is now working.


> Phone Issue - Phone is giving a NAT error message and we are hoping
> that this new subnet will resolve that issue.
> 
> Andy S and Richard H - Once we verify that the phone comes up and are
> able to make calls in/out tomorrow, we would look to migrate all 23
> active 10.1.1.x systems to the new subnet/vlan soon after.
> 
> The goal is to have the MPLS circuit active in Campbell by Friday the
> latest.

What are the implications behind the switch from our current 5Mbit
connection to this MPLS?  Are there bandwidth or reliability
differences?


> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Regards,
> Michael-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
