AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Maxim.Kozlovsky@lsi.com>,<Bill.Fisher@lsi.com>,<Larry.Scheer@lsi.com>,<Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010BD206F2@cosmail02.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:53:39 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Kozlovsky, Maxim" <Maxim.Kozlovsky@lsi.com>
Cc: "Fisher, Bill" <Bill.Fisher@lsi.com>, "Scheer, Larry"
 <Larry.Scheer@lsi.com>, "Fong, Rendell" <Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: Obsolete tuxrx branch directories
Message-ID: <20091214155339.3799aa0d@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010BD206F2@cosmail02.lsi.com>
References: <4B26C729.7080407@lsi.com>
	<861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010BD206D5@cosmail02.lsi.com>
	<4B26C853.3030005@lsi.com>
	<861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010BD206DB@cosmail02.lsi.com>
	<4B26C9B7.1050305@lsi.com>
	<861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010BD206E0@cosmail02.lsi.com>
	<20091214154409.4942a4b3@ripper.onstor.net>
	<861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010BD206F2@cosmail02.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm all for avoiding mental excercises.

But seriously, what is sm-tssc/?

On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:48:52 -0700 "Kozlovsky, Maxim"
<Maxim.Kozlovsky@lsi.com> wrote:

> It is much easier avoiding going through the mental exercise to
> determine what is used or not. Once everything compiles and links,
> you can find out what is used exactly.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Sharp [mailto:andy.sharp@lsi.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 3:44 PM
> To: Kozlovsky, Maxim
> Cc: Fisher, Bill; Scheer, Larry; Fong, Rendell
> Subject: Re: Obsolete tuxrx branch directories
> 
> For all but a handful of the directories, we can axe them now.  For
> tpl, neteee2, sm-eee, ui, we are still using files.  We must wait
> until things compile properly before we can axe them.
> 
> what is sm-tssc?  is it still used?
> 
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:30:15 -0700 "Kozlovsky, Maxim"
> <Maxim.Kozlovsky@lsi.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: William Fisher [mailto:bill.fisher@lsi.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 3:27 PM
> > To: Kozlovsky, Maxim
> > Cc: Scheer, Larry; Sharp, Andy; Fong, Rendell; Fisher, Bill
> > Subject: Re: Obsolete tuxrx branch directories
> > 
> > Kozlovsky, Maxim wrote:
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: William Fisher [mailto:bill.fisher@lsi.com] 
> > > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 3:21 PM
> > > To: Kozlovsky, Maxim
> > > Cc: Scheer, Larry; Sharp, Andy; Fong, Rendell; Fisher, Bill
> > > Subject: Re: Obsolete tuxrx branch directories
> > > 
> > > Kozlovsky, Maxim wrote:
> > > 
> > >>It will be better to postpone this operation until all the code
> > >>compiles, this way you will not accidentally delete something
> > >>necessary.
> > >>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Maybe but editing files in obsolete directories and not in any
> > > Makefile is a make-work effort.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I suggest we do this shortly after larry's merge.
> > > [MK] No, after everything compiles. If these files are not in any
> > > makefile there is no reason for them to be edited so there is no
> > > extra work.
> > > 
> > 	If you are compiling the bsd code, you are using an obsolete
> > Makefile too.
> > 
> > 	Any compilation errors in obsolete direcctories can be
> > ignored.
> > 
> > [MK] Nobody is compiling the bsd code or obsolete directories
