AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<chris@dangerfield7.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	2D0DD53ECBC0489DA266FEB5F6E96EFA@mvista.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:21:00 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: Chris Dangerfield <chris@dangerfield7.com>
Subject: Re: Vahid interview
Message-ID: <20100120102100.1dcbc243@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <2D0DD53ECBC0489DA266FEB5F6E96EFA@mvista.com>
References: <275236143-1263955872-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1966616756-@bda515.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
	<20100120100016.15537ef3@ripper.onstor.net>
	<3F35DE6CA0D547A09785A41118F97495@mvista.com>
	<20100120101104.6980e980@ripper.onstor.net>
	<2D0DD53ECBC0489DA266FEB5F6E96EFA@mvista.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

That and the major shit-storm they're trying to rain down on me for
"using a 3-rd party recruiter" and other complete BS spewage.  I did it
once before, now it's a major offense that I did it again with this
other candidate that we're making an offer to.  I'm hearing that S & A
did something that LSI HR got their panties in a twist over as well.
Something that's completely harmless and insanely trivial.  I really
just don't get it.

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:13:12 -0700 Chris Dangerfield
<chris@dangerfield7.com> wrote:

> Because you have hired 2 engineers, although one you did not want to
> hire and the other has not accepted yet??
> 
> Best regards,
> -Chris
> 
> Chris Dangerfield
> President Dangerfield7 Staffing
> chris@dangerfield7.com
> www.dangerfield7.com
> 408 871 9706 work
> 408 799 5877 cell
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Sharp [mailto:andy.sharp@lsi.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:11 AM
> To: Chris Dangerfield
> Subject: Re: Vahid interview
> 
> I would say not likely at this point, which really makes me
> frustrated, a great candidate as far as I can tell.  I'll keep you
> informed.
> 
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:06:17 -0700 Chris Dangerfield
> <chris@dangerfield7.com> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry bud, but what does that mean?
> > 
> > Can I get Vahid in the mix?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > -Chris
> > 
> > Chris Dangerfield
> > President Dangerfield7 Staffing
> > chris@dangerfield7.com
> > www.dangerfield7.com
> > 408 871 9706 work
> > 408 799 5877 cell
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Sharp [mailto:andy.sharp@lsi.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:00 AM
> > To: chris@dangerfield7.com
> > Subject: Re: Vahid interview
> > 
> > Well, I just got an email from my boss, he's rewriting history
> > again, he has a bit of a track record of doing that.  Let's just
> > say my patience is paper thin at this point.
> > 
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:50:43 -0700 "chris@dangerfield7.com"
> > <chris@dangerfield7.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Andy
> > > 
> > > How could that happen?
> > > If so you should fire the internal recruiter in my opinion
> > > 
> > > Please let me know if vahid is alive there or not asap?
> > > 
> > > Chris
> > > ------Original Message------
> > > From: Andrew Sharp
> > > To: Chris Dangerfield
> > > Sent: Jan 19, 2010 6:34 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Vahid interview
> > > 
> > > I will see my boss tomorrow in Wichita and scream at him.  We all
> > > had a meeting Thursday to hash out the reqs v. candidates, and
> > > only one candidate was given the go-ahead to get an offer.  Today
> > > I get an email that another one of the considered candidates
> > > "accepted." Huh?  I'm pissed and I'm hoping it was a mistake, but
> > > at the same time they said that's it, all the req's are
> > > consumed.  But I'm still hoping it's a mistake and that he's
> > > talking about someone else and therefore miscounted.
> > > 
> > > I'll get back to you when I know more; hopefully heads won't have
> > > to roll.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > a
> > > 
> > > PS The candidate we did make an offer to, the recruiter sent me an
> > > email saying that LSI "...cut the fee by $9k."  I'm not sure what
> > > that means, I thought a contract was a contract, but I'll find
> > > out, I'm sure.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:57:36 -0700 Chris Dangerfield
> > > <chris@dangerfield7.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Andy
> > > > 
> > > > Where do things stand with regards to Vahid?
> > > > 
> > > > Can I schedule his interview??
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > -Chris
> > > > 
> > > > Chris Dangerfield
> > > > President Dangerfield7 Staffing
> > > > chris@dangerfield7.com
> > > > www.dangerfield7.com
> > > > 408 871 9706 work
> > > > 408 799 5877 cell
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> > 
> 
