AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Maxim.Kozlovsky@lsi.com>,<Andy.Sharp@lsi.com>,<Bill.Fisher@lsi.com>,<Larry.Scheer@lsi.com>,<Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>,<Brian.Stark@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010E1E91A8@cosmail02.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:17:41 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Kozlovsky, Maxim" <Maxim.Kozlovsky@lsi.com>
Cc: "Sharp, Andy" <Andy.Sharp@lsi.com>, "Fisher, Bill"
 <Bill.Fisher@lsi.com>, "Scheer, Larry" <Larry.Scheer@lsi.com>, "Fong,
 Rendell" <Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>, "Stark, Brian" <Brian.Stark@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: kernel versus user level boolean definition
Message-ID: <20100301141741.2f2d8451@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010E1E91A8@cosmail02.lsi.com>
References: <4B8C3217.1000400@lsi.com>
	<20100301135724.1bf0ee70@ripper.onstor.net>
	<861DA0537719934884B3D30A2666FECC010E1E91A8@cosmail02.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:16:07 -0700 "Kozlovsky, Maxim"
<Maxim.Kozlovsky@lsi.com> wrote:

> and lack of 'unknown' in gcc value set means it's not truly a
> boolean anyway.
> [MK] Since when SQL definition of Boolean became the "truly" Boolean?
> Does it mean that all other definitions are "falsely" Boolean or
> rather "unknownly" Boolean?

maybe