AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<Brent.Kingsbury@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	4B6A08C587958942AA3002690DD4F8C3BA8708C9@cosmail02.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:38:52 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Kingsbury, Brent" <Brent.Kingsbury@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: TuxStor and Sam.
Message-ID: <20100309073852.2f801b89@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B6A08C587958942AA3002690DD4F8C3BA8708C9@cosmail02.lsi.com>
References: <4B6A08C587958942AA3002690DD4F8C3BA8708C9@cosmail02.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:34:02 -0700 "Kingsbury, Brent"
<Brent.Kingsbury@lsi.com> wrote:

> Andy,
> 
> Purely FYI, Sam is interested in working on the TuxStor effort, if
> you and Jobi, (and whoever else) decide.  (You asked me to ask around
> up here about anyone else who might also be interested.)
> 
> 'That said, having seen _The List_ of all of the filesystem work that
> needs to get done this year, I'd be stupid to claim I am not
> concerned about losing any resources from the filesystem effort.
> It's the usual story we've all seen before:  Buckets 'O Work and
> spoonfuls of time!  Sigh.....

Right, but here's two small reality checks: 1) we don't actually have
to get *all* those filesystem tasks done this year, or even ever; 2)
until we deliver tuxstor, there's nothing to deliver *any* filesystem
features on.
