AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<John.Keiffer@lsi.com>,<Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	85A1D09038E3C1438820EF7A7FAFDD30010AE8ADD1@cosmail01.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:19:06 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Keiffer, John" <John.Keiffer@lsi.com>
Cc: "Fong, Rendell" <Rendell.Fong@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: regarding defect 25826
Message-ID: <20100312131906.28a61e89@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <85A1D09038E3C1438820EF7A7FAFDD30010AE8ADD1@cosmail01.lsi.com>
References: <85A1D09038E3C1438820EF7A7FAFDD30010AE8ADD1@cosmail01.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It looks right to me.

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:20:21 -0700 "Keiffer, John"
<John.Keiffer@lsi.com> wrote:

> I just closed defect 25286 in which Rendell's fix shows the source
> bind for trace route from the vsvr context. Do we not want the same
> thing if run from the SSC context?
> 
> 03/12/10 12:14:58 g9r62 NAS_PERF diag> system traceroute 10.0.0.42
> src ip bind is 192.167.3.1
> traceroute to 10.0.0.42 (10.0.0.42) from 192.167.3.1, 30 hops max, 40
> byte packets 1  summit7i-bbgw.onstor.lab (10.3.0.1)  2.652 ms  1.687
> ms  1.638 ms 2  onstor-lab-dc02.eng.onstor.lab (10.3.0.8)  0.429 ms
> 1.158 ms  0.629 ms 3  ripper.onstor.net (10.0.0.42)  9.891 ms  1.800
> ms  0.531 ms
> 
> 03/12/10 12:15:01 g9r62 NAS_PERF diag> vsvr clear
> 
> 03/12/10 12:17:29 g9r62 diag> system traceroute 10.0.0.42
> traceroute to 10.0.0.42 (10.0.0.42), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
>  1  gateway.onstor.lab (10.2.0.1)  1.020 ms  0.938 ms  2.150 ms
>  2  onstor-lab-dc02.eng.onstor.lab (10.3.0.8)  0.374 ms  0.333 ms
> 0.270 ms 3  ripper.onstor.net (10.0.0.42)  0.238 ms  0.232 ms  0.266
> ms
> 
> If it should have a similar behavior, let me know and I will open a
> defect. If neither of you don't care, I'll forget about it.
> 
> Thanks,
> John
