AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@lsi.com
RQ:
SSV:mhbs.lsil.com
NSV:
SSH:
R:<John.Keiffer@lsi.com>
MAID:2
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/LSI/INBOX	0	85A1D09038E3C1438820EF7A7FAFDD30010B028C84@cosmail01.lsi.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:40:08 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
To: "Keiffer, John" <John.Keiffer@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: top TIME column question
Message-ID: <20100331144008.6508f60c@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <85A1D09038E3C1438820EF7A7FAFDD30010B028C84@cosmail01.lsi.com>
References: <85A1D09038E3C1438820EF7A7FAFDD30010B028C84@cosmail01.lsi.com>
Organization: LSI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

That's minutes and seconds ~:^)  And it's a heck of a lot.  What's the
uptime of this system?

On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:26:58 -0600 "Keiffer, John"
<John.Keiffer@lsi.com> wrote:

> Andy,
> 
> In the following example, what in the heck does "1171:56" mean for
> the time column? Should it be hours:minutes:seconds or something? Is
> this a bug in the kernel or in TOP itself?
> 
> g9r62:~# top -n 1
> top - 13:13:33 up 20:31,  1 user,  load average: 1.11, 1.16, 1.17
> Tasks:  68 total,   2 running,  66 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
> Cpu(s): 29.3%us, 70.0%sy,  0.0%ni,  0.0%id,  0.0%wa,  0.6%hi,
> 0.1%si,  0.0%st Mem:    433548k total,   210472k used,   223076k
> free,    46340k buffers Swap:    30232k total,        0k used,
> 30232k free,    47180k cached
> 
>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
>  1241 root      25   0 20244 5012 1892 S 98.7  1.2   1171:56 evm_cfgd
> 
