AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070524110551.42de346f@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<ken.renshaw@onstor.com>,<larry.scheer@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D164@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:06:06 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>
Bcc: Larry Scheer <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: need to build 1.3.3 latest
Message-ID: <20070524110606.3039767e@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D164@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <20070523175727.11cd43d2@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D15C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<20070524093353.0571d0d4@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D164@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Would it be out of line to say this is broken?  If those files are
needed, they should be in the branch under perforce.  How does
walnut-brain (me) know what files to get and from where?  I might even
go so far as to say the symlink should also be in perforce if the
openbsd tree isn't in the branch.  I guess it's not what I'm used to,
but AFAIK this process isn't documented anywhere.  Of course, this is
1.3.3 so we wouldn't be fixing anything there, but I'm guessing that
in light of events we have changed this methodology for current and
future branches, si?

Cheers,

a

On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:56:32 -0700 "Ken Renshaw"
<ken.renshaw@onstor.com> wrote:

> Without seeing the error, you probably need these files at the same
> level as nfx-tree:
> 
> Copy these four files from /n/Build-Trees/R1.3.3.0/pieces
> 
> gdb
> descr
> descr-bc
> Makefile
> 
> Setup this symlink:
> 
> openbsd.new -> /usr/openbsd.new ( which in turn points
> to /n/Build-Trees/BSD/openbsd-latest-133 )
> 
> When you're done you should have a directoty that looks like this:
> 
> nfx-tree
> openbsd.new
> gdb
> descr
> descr-bc
> Makefile
> 
> Sorry about the hoops, this is from before when I'd only branch
> nfx-tree and reuse the openbsd and other components. All 2.x and 3.x
> branches are complete branches, i.e. with openbsd and the straggler
> files.
> 
> If make release still fails, let me know what the errors are or send
> me the login info and location on your machine and I'll check it out.
> 
> -Ken
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp
> Sent: Thu 5/24/2007 9:33 AM
> To: Ken Renshaw
> Subject: Re: need to build 1.3.3 latest
>  
> I tried that, but "make release" in R1_3_3_X_rel/nfx-tree doesn't
> work.
> 
> On Wed, 23 May 2007 18:28:20 -0700 "Ken Renshaw"
> <ken.renshaw@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hey Andy. If you want the latest 1.3.3.x patched release, 1.3.3.17 I
> > think, then you need to use this nfx-tree view: 
> > //depot/R1_3_3_X_rel/nfx-tree/...@24002 ( current top of tree )
> >  
> > If you want the 1.3.3.0 GA release use this view:
> >  
> > //depot/R1_3_3_X_rel/nfx-tree/...@21707
> >  
> > If you want to use the canned openbsd for this release, just set:
> >  
> > /usr/openbsd.new -> /n/Build-Trees/BSD/openbsd-latest-133
> >  
> > Let me know if you need to know anything else Andy.
> >  
> > -Ken
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: Andy Sharp
> > Sent: Wed 5/23/2007 5:57 PM
> > To: Ken Renshaw
> > Subject: need to build 1.3.3 latest
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Ken,
> > 
> > I need to build the latest 1.3.3 code, but I don't seem know where
> > that is.  I found a branch called R1_3_3_work, but the nfx-tree code
> > does not build in that tree.  I can't find any other likely place to
> > look. Can you tell me where the official branch is for the latest
> > 1.3.3?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > a
> > 
> > 
> 
