AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070608180532.553c6b96@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>,<brian.deforest@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02679EF5@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:05:47 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Sandrine Boulanger" <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
Cc: "Brian DeForest" <brian.deforest@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Question about install script workflow
Message-ID: <20070608180547.7174b5db@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02679EF5@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <20070608174230.55c2527e@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02679EF5@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:46:08 -0700 "Sandrine Boulanger"
<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification. That's great if we don't need this step.
> I was wondering about it in regards to #19489, since I don't have
> another explanation besides memory issue to explain the sudden reboot.
> But the filer was not running any traffic so it's hard to explain.

I experienced the reboot myself when I first started.  But when I added
the nice to the tar process, they went away.  I haven't tested it
myself in a clustered environment, so some experimentation needs to be
done to see if that is the difference, or I've just been lucky, or
there is a memory component to it....

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 5:43 PM
> To: Sandrine Boulanger
> Cc: Brian DeForest
> Subject: Re: Question about install script workflow
> 
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:25:30 -0700 "Sandrine Boulanger"
> <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > Andy, we've noticed that the install script does not do the original
> > reboot to the same flash step (the one that is supposed to clear the
> > memory). Is it because this is no longer needed?
> 
> This initial reboot was originally added to the upgrade workflow when
> running the "old" (prior to 2.2.3 or whatever it's called) upgrade
> from nfxsh, because that used 150+MB of memory, which caused a lot of
> grief.
> 
> This standalone install only uses a couple of MB at most.  I haven't
> found it to be necessary so far, so it is not in the script.  Should
> it be found to be beneficial or necessary, it will be added.
> 
> Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> a
