AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070628133510.4b604466@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<brian.deforest@onstor.com>,<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0451E022@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:35:40 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Brian DeForest" <brian.deforest@onstor.com>
Cc: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: defect triage priorities
Message-ID: <20070628133540.5d83b403@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0451E022@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0451E022@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:30:05 -0700 "Brian DeForest"
<brian.deforest@onstor.com> wrote:

> Andy, Max,
> 
> If you're dissatisfied with the prioritization of defects by the
> "triage team" (and I use that term loosely because the members are
> not well defined and can/do change), I'd suggest you consider
> participating in the defect triage meetings.  I personally think you
> should participate because you would add another perspective as well
> as potentially change the process for the upcoming Cougar defect
> triage to meet your needs. In particular this would be a good time
> because these tend to be project oriented (though they don't have to
> be) and we're currently "between projects".  In fact, there isn't a
> regularly scheduled meeting at the moment, but will/should be
> shortly.  If you're interested, just let me know.

I think it's not fair to say I'm disatisfied.  I sometimes don't agree,
but there will always be some smallish percentage of disagreement from
various corners of engineering about the results of triage of a
particular bug, that's just the way it is.  90% of the time I agree or
accept the judgement, and 10% of the time I push back, hopefully
communicating clearly my reasoning.

Cheers,

a
