AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,<tim.gardner@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#mh/Mailbox/perfarce	2519	WEBMAIL00KstlJnz46d000010f8@mail.onstor.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:40:32 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Maxim Kozlovsky <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
Cc: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 24577 for review
Message-ID: <20070713194032.1c265d9d@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <WEBMAIL00KstlJnz46d000010f8@mail.onstor.com>
References: <WEBMAIL00KstlJnz46d000010f8@mail.onstor.com>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Er, what is the purpose of having OUR_CORE_LIMIT when it's just set to
RLIM_INFINITY and only used in one place?

this:

	rl.rlim_cur = RLIM_INFINITY;
	rl.rlim_max = RLIM_INFINITY;

is a lot more readable than this:

	rl.rlim_cur = OUR_CORE_LIMIT;
	rl.rlim_max = RLIM_INFINITY;



On 13 Jul 2007 15:19:12 -0700 Maxim Kozlovsky
<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:

> Change 24577 by maximk@maximk-5 on 2007/07/13 15:14:09
> 
> 	Allow core generation for onstor apps
> 	   Reviewed by timg.
> 
> Affected files ...
> 
> ... //depot/cougar/nfx-tree/code/ssc-pm/pm.c#5 edit
> ... //depot/cougar/nfx-tree/code/ssc-pm/pm.h#4 edit
> 
> 
> http://liszt:1818/@md=d&cd=//depot/$c=G35@/24577?ac=10
